Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REEVES, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Establishing a Phenomenon

The Rhetoric of Early Medical Reports on AIDS

CAROL REEVES

Butler University

In the first three medical reports on AIDS which were published in 1981 in the New England Journal of Medicine, the writers' primary rhetorical agenda was to argue that a new medical discovery had been made. A secondary agenda was to offer etiological explanations for the new problem. To establish the new disease entity as deserving serious attention, the writers built a sense of mystery by confronting established medical knowledge about immunodeficiency and emphasizing the inability of modern medicine to diagnose and treat the problem. When they explained the phenomenon in etiological terms, rather than confronting the disciplinary matrix, the writers relied on established medical knowledge of infection rates in homosexual males as well as prevailing social views about the dangerous nature of male homosexual activity; consequently, they were able to imply that nothing was mysterious or surprising about immunodeficiency in homosexual males.

Written Communication, Vol. 7, No. 3, 393-416 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088390007003005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
J. F. STRATMAN
Readers' Perception of Bias in Public Education Documents: The Case of Ballot Booklets
Written Communication, October 1, 2000; 17(4): 520 - 578.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
C. REEVES
Language, Rhetoric, and AIDS: The Attitudes and Strategies of Key AIDS Medical Scientists and Physicians
Written Communication, January 1, 1996; 13(1): 130 - 157.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
W. E. RIVERS
Studies in the History of Business and Technical Writing: A Bibliographical Essay
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1994; 8(1): 6 - 57.
[Abstract]

Home page
 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
P. A. Alexander, D. L. Schallert, and V. C. Hare
Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1991; 61(3): 315 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]