Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SPIVEY, N. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Transforming Texts

Constructive Processes in Reading and Writing

NANCY NELSON SPIVEY

Carnegie Mellon University

This article considers the complex processes involved in readers' and writers' construction of textual meaning: how people construct meaning from texts through reading and for texts through writing. Building meaning through reading entails organizing, selecting, and connecting. Readers use previously acquired knowledge to operate on textual cues, organizing mental representations that include material they select from the text and connect with material they generate. This constructivist characterization of the reading process extends also to literate acts in which people are writers as well as readers, those acts in which they compose texts by drawing from textual sources. To meet their discourse goals, writers perform textual transformations associated with the operations of organizing, selecting, and connecting as they appropriate source material for uses in different communicative contexts. They dismantle source texts and reconfigure content they select from these sources, and they interweave the source material with content they generate from stored knowledge. The article describes the kinds of transformations that occur through reading and writing, and proposes a way to think about tasks that invite writers to transform extant texts. Theoretical issues are raised, and suggestions are made for further research.

Written Communication, Vol. 7, No. 2, 256-287 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088390007002004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Language TestingHome page
L. Plakans
Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment
Language Testing, October 1, 2009; 26(4): 561 - 587.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
J. L. Wolfe and C. M. Neuwirth
From the Margins to the Center: The Future of Annotation
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 2001; 15(3): 333 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
P. S. Rogers and J. Rymer
Analytical Tools to Facilitate Transitions Into New Writing Contexts: A Communicative Perspective
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2001; 38(2): 112 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. J. Paxton
A Deafening Silence: History Textbooks and the Students Who Read Them
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1999; 69(3): 315 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
K. M. YOUNG and G. LEINHARDT
Writing from Primary Documents: A Way of Knowing in History
Written Communication, January 1, 1998; 15(1): 25 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
M. J. CHAMBLISS and R. GARNER
Do Adults Change their Minds after Reading Persuasive Text?
Written Communication, July 1, 1996; 13(3): 291 - 313.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
M. A. MATHISON
Writing the Critique, a Text about a Text
Written Communication, July 1, 1996; 13(3): 314 - 354.
[Abstract]

Home page
 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
S. Greene and J. M. Ackerman
Expanding the Constructivist Metaphor: A Rhetorical Perspective on Literacy Research and Practice
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(4): 383 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
G. E. NEWELL
The Effects of Written Between-Draft Responses on Students' Writing and Reasoning about Literature
Written Communication, July 1, 1994; 11(3): 311 - 347.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
M. NYSTRAND, S. GREENE, and J. WIEMELT
Where did Composition Studies Come from?: An Intellectual History
Written Communication, July 1, 1993; 10(3): 267 - 333.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
K. A. SCHRIVER
Teaching Writers to Anticipate Readers' Needs: A Classroom-Evaluated Pedagogy
Written Communication, April 1, 1992; 9(2): 179 - 208.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
S. P. WITTE
Context, Text, Intertext: Toward a Constructivist Semiotic of Writing
Written Communication, April 1, 1992; 9(2): 237 - 308.


Home page
 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
P. Smagorinsky and M. W. Smith
The Nature of Knowledge in Composition and Literary Understanding: The Question of Specificity
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1992; 62(3): 279 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]