This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McGINLEY, W. Articles by TIERNEY, R. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Traversing the Topical Landscape

Reading and Writing as Ways of Knowing

University of Michigan

ROBERT J. TIERNEY

Ohio State University

In light of recent theoretical and empirical developments in the areas of reading, writing, and learning, this article proposes a view of literacy learning in which various forms of reading and writing are conceptualized as unique ways of thinking about and exploring a topic of study en route to acquiring knowledge. Throughout this article, we take the theoretical position that a topic of study is analogous to a conceptual "landscape" about which knowledge is best acquired by "traversing" it from a variety of perspectives. In this system, different forms of reading and writing represent the "traversal routes" through which an individual can explore a given content domain. Specifically, we wish to argue that more complex or diverse combinations of different forms of reading and writing provide a learner with the means to conduct a more critical inquiry of a topic by virtue of the multiple perspectives or ways of "seeing" and thinking that these reading and writing exchanges permit. Finally, in light of this theoretical orientation, we contend that the ability to direct dynamically one's own reading and writing engagements en route to learning is central to conducting an inquiry of this nature. This perspective suggests a reexamination of a line of research that has pursued the question of how writing in combination with reading influences thinking and learning.

Written Communication, Vol. 6, No. 3, 243-269 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088389006003001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. YOUNG and G. LEINHARDT Writing from Primary Documents: A Way of Knowing in History Written Communication, January 1, 1998; 15(1): 25 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Greene and J. M. Ackerman Expanding the Constructivist Metaphor: A Rhetorical Perspective on Literacy Research and Practice Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(4): 383 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. PRIOR Response, Revision, Disciplinarity: A Microhistory of a Dissertation Prospectus in Sociology Written Communication, October 1, 1994; 11(4): 483 - 533. [Abstract]

				G. E. NEWELL The Effects of Written Between-Draft Responses on Students' Writing and Reasoning about Literature Written Communication, July 1, 1994; 11(3): 311 - 347. [Abstract]

				D. A. WINSOR Invention and Writing in Technical Work: Representing the Object Written Communication, April 1, 1994; 11(2): 227 - 250. [Abstract]

				J. M. ACKERMAN The Promise of Writing to Learn Written Communication, July 1, 1993; 10(3): 334 - 370. [Abstract]

				P. PRIOR Contextualizing Writing and Response in a Graduate Seminar Written Communication, July 1, 1991; 8(3): 267 - 310. [Abstract]

				A. S. Palincsar, Y. M. David, J. A. Winn, and D. D. Stevens Examining the Context of Strategy Instruction Remedial and Special Education, May 1, 1991; 12(3): 43 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. CUMMING Metalinguistic and Ideational Thinking in Second Language Composing Written Communication, October 1, 1990; 7(4): 482 - 511. [Abstract]