This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bremner, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Politeness, Power, and Activity Systems

Written Requests and Multiple Audiences in an Institutional Setting

City University of Hong Kong

This article, using data from a year-long study of writing processes in an institutional context, looks at the demands made on writers in workplace environments as they make requests of their colleagues. Building on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory, the study takes a view of context as being a key factor in framing requests, in addition subscribing to the notion of context as an ongoing dynamic, or mutually constitutive activity system. Although the variables of relative power and degree of imposition are important factors in the choices writers make, a further consideration is the need to balance their own relational needs with the expectations of the institution as they create texts for multiple audiences. In addition, the linguistic choices writers make in such contexts as they position themselves in relation to their peers and those further up the hierarchy may also serve to define and reinforce their identity within the institution.

Key Words: workplace writing • politeness theory • inherent and relative power • context as ongoing dynamic • requests and multiple audiences

Written Communication, Vol. 23, No. 4, 397-423 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088306293707


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?