Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bracewell, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Witte, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Tasks, Ensembles, and Activity

Linkages between Text Production and Situation of Use in the Workplace

Robert J. Bracewell

McGill University robert.bracewell{at}mcgill.ca

Stephen P. Witte

Kent State University switte{at}kent.edu

This article is concerned with characterizing literacy activity as it is practiced in professional workplaces. Its starting point is activity theory, which grew out of the work of Vygotsky and has been subsequently elaborated in Russia and elsewhere. First, the authors propose that existing versions of activity theory are unable to account adequately for practical human activity in contemporary workplaces, and present a revised perspective that opens the way for new theoretical developments. Second, they elaborate two new constructs, task and work ensemble, and apply them to a short collaborative writing sequence collected in the field. Both constructs are seen to account in a substantive way for the structure of the composing activity carried out by the collaborators. They close with a discussion of the complementarity and theoretical advantages of the two constructs.

Key Words: theories of writing • workplace literacy • activity theory

Written Communication, Vol. 20, No. 4, 511-559 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088303260691


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
N. Artemeva
Toward a Unified Social Theory of Genre Learning
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 160 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
J. Jones
Patterns of Revision in Online Writing: A Study of Wikipedia's Featured Articles
Written Communication, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 262 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
J. Angouri and N. Harwood
This Is Too Formal for Us...: A Case Study of Variation in the Written Products of a Multinational Consortium
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 38 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
R. E. Burnett and C. Haas
Explicating "Writing as an Embodied Practice": A Conversation Between Rebecca E. Burnett and Christina Haas
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 27 - 36.
[PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
R. J. Bracewell
Stephen P. Witte: (1943-2004) A Brief Biography
Written Communication, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 124 - 126.
[PDF]