Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilder, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"Get Comfortable With Uncertainty"

A Study of the Conventional Values of Literary Analysis in an Undergraduate Literature Course

Laura Wilder

University of Texas at Austin

This study describes the extent to which shared assumptions of literary scholars form part of an introductory literature course. Fahnestock and Secor, in The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism, describe five special topoi of literary criticism (appearance/reality, paradigm, ubiquity, contemptus mundi, and paradox) that characterize the warrants of literary criticism appearing in a sample of major literary studies journals. This study triangulates ethnographic data of a class's meetings, analyses of students' essays, and questionnaires to discover whether these topoi are communicated to students in a survey course, whether students recognize and use them, and whether students are rewarded for using them. The special topoi of literary criticism appear in the discourse of instructors and students. Though textual analysis did not reveal a connection between using the special topoi in writing assignments and receiving a higher grade, questionnaires revealed that students adept at recognizing literary values and discourse conventions were more successful.

Written Communication, Vol. 19, No. 1, 175-221 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/074108830201900106
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PedagogyHome page
N. L. Chick, H. Hassel, and A. Haynie
"Pressing an Ear against the Hive": Reading Literature for Complexity
Pedagogy, October 1, 2009; 9(3): 399 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
J. E. Warren
Literary Scholars Processing Poetry and Constructing Arguments
Written Communication, April 1, 2006; 23(2): 202 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
L. Wilder
"The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism" Revisited: Mistaken Critics, Complex Contexts, and Social Justice
Written Communication, January 1, 2005; 22(1): 76 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PedagogyHome page
J. Wolfe
A Method for Teaching Invention in the Gateway Literature Class
Pedagogy, October 1, 2003; 3(3): 399 - 426.
[PDF]