Written Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HYLAND, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Written Communication, Vol. 18, No. 4, 549-574 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088301018004005

Bringing in the Reader

Addressee Features in Academic Articles

KEN HYLAND

City University of Hong Kong

Much of the literature concerning participant relationships in academic writing has discussed features that project the stance, identity, or credibility of the writer, rather than examining how writers engage with readers. In contrast, this article focuses on strategies that presuppose the active role of addressees, examining six key ways that writers seek explicitly to establish the presence of their readers in the discourse. Based on an analysis of 240 published research articles from eight disciplines and insider informant interviews, the author examines the dialogic nature of persuasion in research writing through the ways writers (a) address readers directly using inclusive or second person pronouns and interjections and (b) position them with questions, directives, and references to shared knowledge. The analysis underlines the importance of audience engagement in academic argument and provides insights into how the discoursal preferences of disciplinary communities rhetorically construct readers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
D. P. Tansley, L. M. Jome, R. F. Haase, and M. P. Martens
The Effects of Message Framing on College Students' Career Decision Making
Journal of Career Assessment, August 1, 2007; 15(3): 301 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
N. Harwood
(In)appropriate Personal Pronoun Use in Political Science: A Qualitative Study and a Proposed Heuristic for Future Research
Written Communication, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 424 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
K. Hyland
Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse
Discourse Studies, May 1, 2005; 7(2): 173 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
B. Faber
Creating Rhetorical Stability in Corporate University Discourse: Discourse Technologies and Change
Written Communication, October 1, 2003; 20(4): 391 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]