Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HERNDL, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by NAHRWOLD, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research as Social Practice

A Case Study of Research on Technical and Professional Communication

CARL G. HERNDL

New Mexico State University

CYNTHIA A. NAHRWOLD

New Mexico State University

Most discussions of qualitative research organize research methodologies according to their place in a set of research paradigms identified by epistemological and ontological commitments. Drawing on the work of Bourdieu, the authors argue for a theory of research as social practice in which researchers' purposes are determined not by philosophical paradigms but by their commitments to specific forms of social action. The authors offer a model of research practices organized according to their relationship to social power rather than abstract paradigms. From this perspective, the dilemmas presented by recent postmodern critiques of representation, the inclusion and co-optation of participants' voices, and validity become a question of ethics. The authors explore the problems of postmodern ethics and qualitative research through the work of Bauman.

Written Communication, Vol. 17, No. 2, 258-296 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088300017002004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
A. Koerber
"You Just Don't See Enough Normal": Critical Perspectives on Infant-Feeding Discourse and Practice
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 2005; 19(3): 304 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
G. A. Cross
Protecting the Voices of Our Research: Appropriately Verifying Qualitative Data
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 2004; 18(4): 491 - 504.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
E. Barton
Discourse Methods and Critical Practice in Professional Communication: The Front-Stage and Back-Stage Discourse of Prognosis in Medicine
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 67 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
B. Faber
Creating Rhetorical Stability in Corporate University Discourse: Discourse Technologies and Change
Written Communication, October 1, 2003; 20(4): 391 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]