Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAYES, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by SILK, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Does Holistic Assessment Predict Writing Performance?

Estimating the Consistency of Student Performance on Holistically Scored Writing Assignments

JOHN R. HAYES

Carnegie Mellon University

JILL A. HATCH

Carnegie Mellon University

CHRISTINE M. SILK

Los Angeles, California

This study addressed the question, "How consistently do students perform on holistically scored writing assignments?" Instructors from 13 introductory writing classes at two colleges were asked to provide essay sets written by their students in response to the three to five most important writing assignments in their classes. In all, 796 essays were collected from 241 students. The study drew on a pool of 15 experienced judges to evaluate the essays. Each essay set was scored holistically and independently by 6 of the judges who either ranked or graded the essays in the set. All papers written by a particular student were scored by the same judges. Pairwise correlations of the scores assigned to each essay set were computed for each judge and then averaged across judges. The average of these correlations was 0.16, indicating very low consistency of holistically scored student performance from essay to essay. This result suggests that drawing conclusions from one or even a few writing samples is problematic.

Written Communication, Vol. 17, No. 1, 3-26 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088300017001001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
P. S. Rogers and J. Rymer
Analytical Tools to Facilitate Transitions Into New Writing Contexts: A Communicative Perspective
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2001; 38(2): 112 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
R. L. JOHNSON, J. PENNY, and B. GORDON
Score Resolution and the Interrater Reliability of Holistic Scores in Rating Essays
Written Communication, April 1, 2001; 18(2): 229 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]