Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GUNNARSSON, B.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Writing Process from a Sociolinguistic Viewpoint

BRITT-LOUISE GUNNARSSON

Uppsala University

This article elaborates and evaluates a sociolinguistic framework for the study of writing. The first part of the article discusses different sociolinguistic concepts and theories and introduces the two concepts of communicative community and communicative group, which encompass speech and writing, as well as communication of both local and distant and public and private types. For the purposes of these concepts, written and spoken discourse are assumed to be intermingled in the communicative process and steered by similar sociocognitive conditions. The second part of the article discusses the application of the theoretical framework to a specific case, the writing that takes place at a local government office. The study comprises analyses of the organizational structure and its effects on writing at work, the communicative process and the role of spoken discourse and collaboration in the construction of documents, and the social dimension of writing at work. This workplace is found to constitute a communicative group of the local-public type, which means that communication at the office is part of a socially based and hierarchically structured set of communicative activities, with a close intertwinement of spoken and written discourse.

Written Communication, Vol. 14, No. 2, 139-188 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088397014002001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
H. Osman
Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: a genre perspective
Discourse & Communication, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 57 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
A. BEAUFORT
Learning the Trade: A Social Apprenticeship Model for Gaining Writing Expertise
Written Communication, April 1, 2000; 17(2): 185 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Discourse StudiesHome page
B.-L. GUNNARSSON
Discourse, Organizations and National Cultures
Discourse Studies, February 1, 2000; 2(1): 5 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
D. A. WINSOR
Genre and Activity Systems: The Role of Documentation in Maintaining and Changing Engineering Activity Systems
Written Communication, April 1, 1999; 16(2): 200 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
R. J. BRACEWELL
Objects of Study in Situated Literacy: The Role of Representations in Moving from Data to Explanation
Written Communication, January 1, 1999; 16(1): 76 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]