Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMAGORINSKY, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Personal Growth in Social Context

A High School Senior's Search for Meaning in and Through Writing

PETER SMAGORINSKY

University of Oklahoma

The different emphases that theorists and teachers place on the product and process of writing in their accounts of how writers construct meaning have been influenced by different traditions of Western thought that have historically been at odds: Whereas the designative tradition focuses on the ways in which artifacts of speech mediate people's thinking, the expressive tradition focuses on the transformation of inner speech to public speech, thus emphasizing the ways in which the activities of speaking and writing promote changes in consciousness. In this article, through the analysis of the writing of a high school senior, it is argued that these two positions are not mutually exclusive, but rather are complementary aspects of a semiotic view on writing. The primary data set is a "situated protocol"—that is, a think-aloud protocol, including both concurrent and retrospective accounts of writing process, conducted over a 4-month period. Through the protocol analysis and analysis of related data, I examine the ways in which this student's writing experiences reveal the interrelated roles of both designative and expressive functions of writing. The analysis also reveals that the writer found the situated protocol itself to be an enduring means of development and reflection and a tool for meditation.

Written Communication, Vol. 14, No. 1, 63-105 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088397014001002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
P. Smagorinsky
The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports
Written Communication, July 1, 2008; 25(3): 389 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
P. Smagorinsky, M. Zoss, and P. M. Reed
Residential Interior Design as Complex Composition: A Case Study of a High School Senior's Composing Process
Written Communication, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 295 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
P. Smagorinsky, V. Pettis, and P. Reed
High School Students' Compositions of Ranch Designs: Implications for Academic and Personal Achievement
Written Communication, October 1, 2004; 21(4): 386 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
P. Smagorinsky
If Meaning Is Constructed, What Is It Made From? Toward a Cultural Theory of Reading
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2001; 71(1): 133 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]