Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Written Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHARNEY, D.
Right arrow Articles by PALMQUIST, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"I'm Just No Good at Writing"

Epistemological Style and Attitudes Toward Writing

DAVIDA CHARNEY

Penn State University

JOHN H. NEWMAN

Mount St. Mary's College

MIKE PALMQUIST

Colorado State College

The authors assessed writing attitudes and epistemologies of 117 first-year and 329 upper-level undergraduates. Attitude scales assessed enjoyment of writing, self-ratings of writing ability, and belief in writing as learnable. Epistemological scales measured absolutism (belief in knowledge as determinably true or false), relativism (belief in the indeterminacy of all claims), and evaluativism (belief that truth can be approximated). Absolutism correlated negatively with writing grades and verbal aptitude, whereas evaluativism exhibited a weak positive correlation with both. Students with higher evaluativism tended to enjoy writing more and to assess themselves as good writers. Upper-level students were less absolutist and marginally more evaluativist than first-year students. Differences in attitudes and epistemologies emerged between men and women and among upper-level students in four disciplinary groups. The authors sketch some implications for writing pedagogy.

Written Communication, Vol. 12, No. 3, 298-329 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088395012003004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
L. Wilder
"Get Comfortable With Uncertainty": A Study of the Conventional Values of Literary Analysis in an Undergraduate Literature Course
Written Communication, January 1, 2002; 19(1): 175 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
D. BLINE, D. R. LOWE, W. F. MEIXNER, H. NOURI, and K. PEARCE
A Research Note on the Dimensionality of Daly and Miller's Writing Apprehension Scale
Written Communication, January 1, 2001; 18(1): 61 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]