This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by WINSOR, D. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Invention and Writing in Technical Work

Representing the Object

GMI Engineering & Management Institute

Traditionally, invention has been regarded as relatively unimportant in technical writing because of the widely held notion that technologists generate their ideas prior to writing. It has recently been argued, however, that studies of situated writing encounter difficulties due to restricted ideas of writing and text. For instance, if writing means only transcribing extended pieces of prose, then it is difficult to account for the way invention is performed in technical writing. The wider idea of writing allows us to look differently at this instance of situated writing. Using this wider idea, a study of 3 engineering students engaged in a real-world project shows that the technical work of the project and invention for the students' final report were actually simultaneous rather than sequential activities. Moreover, writing in the form of notes and lists contributed to technical work and served to make knowledge communal among group members. In the technical writing examined here, invention for writing, invention through writing, and technical invention itself heavily overlapped.

Written Communication, Vol. 11, No. 2, 227-250 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0741088394011002003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Jeyaraj Liminality and Othering: The Issue of Rhetorical Authority in Technical Discourse Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 9 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. HALLER Rhetorical Invention in Design: Constructing a System and Spec Written Communication, July 1, 2000; 17(3): 353 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Dannels Learning to Be Professional: Technical Classroom Discourse, Practice, and Professional Identity Construction Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 5 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Lewis Talking to Texts and Sketches: The Function of Written and Graphic Mediation in Engineering Design Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 2000; 63(2): 110 - 116. [PDF]

				D. A. WINSOR Genre and Activity Systems: The Role of Documentation in Maintaining and Changing Engineering Activity Systems Written Communication, April 1, 1999; 16(2): 200 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. WINSOR Rhetorical Practices in Technical Work Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 1998; 12(3): 343 - 370. [Abstract]

				P. MEDWAY Virtual and Material Buildings: Construction and Constructivism in Architecture and Writing Written Communication, October 1, 1996; 13(4): 473 - 514. [Abstract]

				E. CHIN Redefining "Context" in Research on Writing Written Communication, October 1, 1994; 11(4): 445 - 482. [Abstract]